<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deekap Chopra, grumpy gus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apenotmonkey.com/2010/01/19/deekap-chopra-grumpy-gus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apenotmonkey.com/2010/01/19/deekap-chopra-grumpy-gus/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=deekap-chopra-grumpy-gus</link>
	<description>The Science vs. Religion Comic Strip. Updated Every Monday,  Wednesday and Friday!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:15:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilGod</title>
		<link>http://www.apenotmonkey.com/2010/01/19/deekap-chopra-grumpy-gus/comment-page-1/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilGod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apenotmonkey.com/?p=784#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what&#039;s worse. These &#039;spiritualists&#039; or the gullible fools who are so quick to pay them?

If Mr. Shermer gets to debate him will there be a requirement that the responses meet some standard like perhaps using whole sentences of comprehensible English? If there was it would be interesting but it is very unlikely that a man who has made a fortune being intentionally vague would agree and would most likely manage to make it look like the requirement was somehow biased or discriminatory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s worse. These &#8216;spiritualists&#8217; or the gullible fools who are so quick to pay them?</p>
<p>If Mr. Shermer gets to debate him will there be a requirement that the responses meet some standard like perhaps using whole sentences of comprehensible English? If there was it would be interesting but it is very unlikely that a man who has made a fortune being intentionally vague would agree and would most likely manage to make it look like the requirement was somehow biased or discriminatory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://www.apenotmonkey.com/2010/01/19/deekap-chopra-grumpy-gus/comment-page-1/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>Gibbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apenotmonkey.com/?p=784#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>Aha what a clown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha what a clown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

